| Local
authorities grant planning permission for greyhound tracks with no
conditions relating to their operation regarding animal welfare. Local
authorities have a false sense of confidence in the suitability of tracks
that is derived from the NGRC's standard-setting role for kennels and
housing. |
In our view the
welfare of greyhounds used for racing should be regulated. Local
authorities should have powers to set standards at tracks, kennels and for
homing services. They should have the power of inspection - and use it -
to ensure that these standards are met. |
| Veterinary
surgeons safeguarding the welfare of greyhounds at the track should be
independent of track management and independently financed. Only when they
are free of commercial pressure will they be able to exercise professional
judgement appropriately to the benefit of the dogs. The same veterinary
surgeons should be available to advise local authorities in their
functions. |
Although they
do not have the same resources at their disposal as the NGRC tracks, we
believe that, in the interests of the greyhounds' welfare, independent
('flapping') tracks should be subject to the same standards and
regulations. |